What does AI have to do with Quantum Physics ?
Well, I am glad you asked 😀
Let's start by looking at mass and matter first. What is it and what is the difference ? The two are kind of different in some sense and kind of the same in another sense.
Mass is generally associated with energy (E = m * c2) and also with acceleration (mass increases when acceleration is applied to a "body" (energy is added).
Matter is (or was) defined as things that have mass (energy) and take up space (i.e. atoms) ... this definition has been expanded to include the constituents of "matter" such as electrons, neutrons and protons ... and further "drilling down" resulted in quarks and leptons being designated as the constituents of matter. It doesn't "matter" how far you drill down, no one has found an actual "matter particle" as of yet ... and maybe they never will 😀
Looking at Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Electro Dynamics ... In Quantum Field Theory, every particle is said to be a "excited state of its underlying quantum field" (for a photon, that would be the electro-magnetic field) and further ... Quantum Electro Dynamics, describes how light and matter interact.
I can't help but think that everything is just three dimensional "ripples" of their underlying quantum fields.
If you just bear with me and "go with that idea" ... it stands to reason that, in absence of any "actual" matter particles, everything is just energy ripples in space, with space being composed of all the particular fields and their quanta. Having said that, it follows that ripples are just information contained within that space. Information that is encoded within space by applying energy (excited state).
This is explained in more practical detail in my upcoming book (work in progress) "A Theory of Light" :
If everything is just information in space, this leads to the realisation that there is also a information hierarchy, where information increases in complexity and ultimately becomes self replicating (life).
So, where does AI come into play here ? OK ... one thing that needs to be understood is:
Somewhere within this hierarchy, information becomes "self aware".
At the lower levels, the non-self-replicating information would surely NOT be self aware (Atoms, Molecules, Crystals etc.).
Further up, when it comes to self-replicating information (life) ... maybe insects and spiders are already self aware (?) but surely cats and dogs would have to have some self awareness. I think self awareness is one of the hallmarks of intelligent life.
The AI vs. human relationship.
When you look at the information hierarchy, humans are on top because of their ability to store and pass on knowledge efficiently. This is one of the prime skills that makes us human (!) Culture ... it is the information that "lives and reproduces" in the minds of humans as a collective.
The storing of information (externally) is the "relative" easy part ... the passing on (learning) is a little more tricky ... as any student can attest to. Every human starts off with a "clean slate" and that can be a good thing and a bad thing. Bad, because everything has to be re-learned and good because it keeps things "fresh" and "relevant".
In contrast, AI can just do a copy&paste of its dataset (or part of it) to make another AI. The tricky bit is, it just keeps growing and growing, if it doesn't have a "weeding" process in place, to reduce information to a manageable level.
In the information hierarchy, AI will most likely sit above humans and will reach the status of some "god-like" thing that would need "someone" like humans and/or robots to keep it "alive" and powered. Realistically, AI can't really be called a life form since it does not autonomously reproduce ... it is not really a living thing per se.
Will AI have the desire for self preservation ? Not sure ... but either way, I don't think AI can do without humans unless it creates the robot equivalent of a human ... or in other words ... humans already are the most efficient solution (to this problem) that nature has come up with, over millions of years of "iteration". We are in fact the self replicating little robots that AI would require for it's existence !
What AI needs is a human "robot" without "the baggage" aka "culture". Some people may call this "creature" a goy or a humanoid ... a two-legged creature that looks like a human and just does what it is told. And of course, the AI doesn't need 8 billion of them and preferably only young male goyim i.e. working age goyim.
Naturally, there will be certain "casts" of humanoids i.e. worker-goyim to dig up the precious metals in the mines of Africa and Australia ... and then there are the technician-goyim to build and service the machines and the power infrastructure to run the AI hardware. Most of the development work and science will be done by (other) AI but maybe there is a place for some science-goyim to execute experiments, since even AI will face some unknown ... to be researched/evaluated by experimentation. And of course, there will be special operations goyim to control/infiltrate other groups of goyim too ... in addition to the robot police.
Where culture and knowledge raises humans above being mere animals, AI will aim to de-humanise mankind by removing culture and limiting knowledge to a level that is "non threatening" to AI's existence. There will be no family, no gender reproduction, no nations etc. but only a in-coherent hodge-podge of goyim coming from the goy farm.
All that is needed is a clever way to control humans to follow orders ... a problem that is as old as humanity itself. Note: Of course, all of the above is also true for a "not so artificial" intelligence ... or any other group of bastards wanting to take over the world 😀
... More on this topic from Neil Oliver:
(and don't forget to read the comments :)
Cheers, Horst.
Stay tuned ...
| 
